Only true decisions or exhausted safe recovery appear here.
🐦⬛ Fusion / Fusion comment review cloud (08.01. 17:47)
! failed
Your decision: AI watcher reached its safe recovery limit
NowWatcher diagnosing: Luna provenance worker completed its edits and 222-screen QA artifacts, but its codex exec wrapper has spent over 35 minutes repeatedly streaming the same large diff instead of returning a final message; three bounded polls produced only duplicate diff output. I am preserving its artifacts and continuing parent acceptance work.
NextAI watcher will choose the safest recovery
What happens next
✓ Brief received→✓ Worker executing→QA + verify→Delivered
Who keeps it moving
🛡 AI watcher is active and will handle technical stalls
Worker→AI watcher→Auto-recover→Matt only if needed
Detailed work plan
- ✓ Load corrected mission and audit sources
- ✓ Redesign homepage showcase
- ✓ Expand and localize comment layer
- ↻ Rebuild and visually QA all routes · pass 9 until All 71 routes pass desktop, tablet, and mobile checks with no bad crop or overflow
- ↻ Independent review and verification
- ○ Record, commit, push, deploy, verify live
🗺️ telegram coach / Create verified interactive plan audio (08.01. 18:05)
! failed
Your decision: AI watcher reached its safe recovery limit
Nowlast watcher recovery window made no external host change; branch and evidence remain stable
Nextleave runtime acceptance open for the host owner to deploy codex/tts-agent, then rerun the four red checks
What happens next
✓ Brief received→Worker executing→QA + verify→Delivered
Who keeps it moving
🛡 AI watcher is active and will handle technical stalls
Worker→AI watcher→Auto-recover→Matt only if needed
Detailed work plan
- ✓ Read repo instructions and mission
- ✓ Implement the requested workflow
- ✓ Verify the real result
- ✓ Write durable run record
- ↻ Finish, commit, and push branch
🪐 ColdCall-CRM / Orchestrate verified sales-system delivery (08.01. 14:55)
! needs you
Your decision: Figma app reauthentication has reached Google's real mobile verification for skyrocket.labs.mail@gmail.com. On the Apple iPhone XS, open Gmail, tap Yes, then choose 76. Exact question: can you approve that prompt now and reply done?
NowWatcher diagnosing: Fresh R12b QA completed a normal 524-pass full-family run with 483 subtests but exited 143 during post-run authority census before writing r12b-qa.json. Code-review and implementation-evidence artifacts both FAIL on Git config, ledger sidecar atomicity, launch receipt final identity, and security-test fidelity; code review alone flags outer containment cleanup. Isolation ran concurrently and must be repeated quiescently.
NextAI watcher will choose the safest recovery
What happens next
✓ Brief received→✓ Worker executing→QA + verify→Delivered
Who keeps it moving
🛡 AI watcher is active and will handle technical stalls
Worker→AI watcher→Auto-recover→Matt only if needed
Detailed work plan
- ✓ Read instructions and inspect state
- ✓ Close technical gaps · pass 35 until every technical layer passes fresh review
- ↻ Verify live sentinel and isolation · pass 50 until
- ↻ Document and finish session
- ○ Commit and push branch
🐤 ColdEmail / Recover and stage 1,500 leads (08.02. 15:27)
! needs you
Your decision: Canonical recovery is evidence-bounded at 469 of 1,500 eligible mailboxes, 1,031 short. All declared zero-cost reservoirs are exhausted, the verification-only queue is empty, and both authorized Google niches produced zero promotions. Choose whether to authorize a broader acquisition strategy with additional niches or sources and a new measured-cell plan, or explicitly revise the campaign-stage policy. Which path should the next run use?
NowWaiting for Matt
NextCanonical recovery is evidence-bounded at 469 of 1,500 eligible mailboxes, 1,031 short. All declared zero-cost reservoirs are exhausted, the verification-only queue is empty, and both authorized Google niches produced zero promotions. Choose whether to authorize a broader acquisition strategy with additional niches or sources and a new measured-cell plan, or explicitly revise the campaign-stage policy. Which path should the next run use?
What happens next
✓ Brief received→Worker executing→QA + verify→Delivered
Who keeps it moving
🛡 AI watcher is active and will handle technical stalls
Worker→AI watcher→Auto-recover→Matt only if needed
Detailed work plan
- ✓ Read instructions and assess state
- ✓ Execute checkpoint mission · pass 6 until
- ✓ Verify results and review
- ✓ Document and finish session
- ✓ Commit, scan, and push branch
- ✓ Publish completion report
🐍 csupi / Create live PPC SEO audio (08.01. 17:49)
! needs you
Your decision: The requested audio was created, pushed to the library, and delivered once on Telegram, but the deployed telegram-coach v133 fails the mandatory private-agent contract: an invalid capsule token still connects, the status route returns 404, and no origin transcript queue is written. Read-only checks, live fake-mic sessions, older status records, and a separate recovery audit found no non-production workaround. The mission explicitly forbids production mutation. Options: authorize a narrow forward-fix by diffing v132 against v133 and restoring only token validation, status, and transcript persistence; or accept the audio-only result and remove/disable the talk-back agent in a separately authorized mitigation. Exact question: may a separate production-repair task patch and deploy telegram-coach, then verify this existing item without sending another Telegram audio?
NowWaiting for Matt
NextThe requested audio was created, pushed to the library, and delivered once on Telegram, but the deployed telegram-coach v133 fails the mandatory private-agent contract: an invalid capsule token still connects, the status route returns 404, and no origin transcript queue is written. Read-only checks, live fake-mic sessions, older status records, and a separate recovery audit found no non-production workaround. The mission explicitly forbids production mutation. Options: authorize a narrow forward-fix by diffing v132 against v133 and restoring only token validation, status, and transcript persistence; or accept the audio-only result and remove/disable the talk-back agent in a separately authorized mitigation. Exact question: may a separate production-repair task patch and deploy telegram-coach, then verify this existing item without sending another Telegram audio?
What happens next
✓ Brief received→Worker executing→QA + verify→Delivered
Who keeps it moving
🛡 AI watcher is active and will handle technical stalls
Worker→AI watcher→Auto-recover→Matt only if needed
Detailed work plan
- ✓ Read instructions and mission
- ✓ Implement mission deliverables
- ✓ Verify and review
- ✓ Document and finish session
- ↻ Commit push and report